Skip to content

Conversation

@ArBridgeman
Copy link
Collaborator

@ArBridgeman ArBridgeman commented Jan 29, 2026

closes #680
closes #658

Checklist

Note: If any of the items in the checklist are not relevant to your PR, just check the box.

For any Pull Request

Is the following correct:

  • the title of the Pull Request?
  • the title of the corresponding issue?
  • there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • that the issue which this Pull Request fixes ("Fixes...") is mentioned?

When Changes Were Made

Did you:

  • update the changelog?
  • update the cookiecutter-template?
  • update the implementation?
  • check coverage and add tests: unit tests and, if relevant, integration tests?
  • update the User Guide & other documentation?
  • resolve any failing CI criteria (incl. Sonar quality gate)?

When Preparing a Release

Have you:

  • thought about version number (major, minor, patch)?
  • checked Exasol packages for updates and resolved open vulnerabilities, if easily possible?

ckunki
ckunki previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2026
ckunki
ckunki previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2026
@ArBridgeman ArBridgeman deployed to manual-approval January 29, 2026 10:47 — with GitHub Actions Active
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@ArBridgeman ArBridgeman merged commit a6a859e into main Jan 29, 2026
61 checks passed
@ArBridgeman ArBridgeman deleted the refactoring/680_remove_needs_in_checks branch January 29, 2026 13:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reduce dependencies in checks Update User guide for adding Sonar to private repositories

3 participants